NASA Reviews Comments on Moon: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is a space agency in the Unite States. In this blog, they provide feedback on the public comments they receive about their moon to mars objectives.

What are the objectives?

NASA is reviewing comments on the agency’s plan for reaching Mars, which includes a moon landing by the end of the 2030s. The review was prompt by President Donald Trump’s directive last year to establish a “space policy that establishes Unite States leadership in space” and to “use all appropriate means to enable the timely completion of a comprehensive and compelling exploration and development program for human spaceflight.”

NASA’s revision of its Mars exploration strategy emphasizes returning humans to the Red Planet as soon as possible, with an ultimate goal of establishing a human presence there. The agency is considering several objectives for this mission, including: verifying whether life exists on Mars; studying Martian soils and surface features in detail; preparing for future human missions; and advancing knowledge about energy resources available on Mars.

Nasa has release a statement responding to comments on their objectives for sending people to Mars. The space agency states that their ultimate goal is to send humans there and establish a permanent human presence. They also say that they will use the moon as a testing ground for technologies need for a trip to Mars, such as advance propulsion systems and life support systems.

How is this going to make earth safer?

NASA is reviewing the comments on their Mars objectives document to ensure that they are taking into account all of the feedback from the public and scientific communities. The document, which was release in early February, lays out NASA’s goals for sending humans to Mars in the 2030s.One of the goals is to develop tools and techniques to use Earth’s natural resources as a basis for sustaining human life on Mars. This would include learning how to extract water, food, and other resources from the Martian surface or atmosphere.

According to Eric Berger, an engineering consultant at Lock Martin who has work with space agencies on missions to Mars, this is a necessary step in order to make long-term human habitation viable. “The idea of having terrestrial architecture on another planet is pretty cool,” Berger said. “You can start thinking about it now.”Many experts agree that developing these skills will be essential if we want humans to survive on Mars for any length of time. “A lot of this technology development needs to happen before people land there,” said Ian Crawford, a research scientist at MIT’s Space Systems Laboratory. “Otherwise you’re just setting them up for failure.”

NASA Reviews Comments on Moon NASA is reviewing comments on its moon to Mars objectives to ensure the agency’s goals are achievable. The review was prompt by a White House report that suggests the United States should no longer focus on reaching Mars and instead focus on developing an infrastructure on the moon.Nasa has releas a document outlining its plan for reaching Mars, and it emphasizes returning astronauts to the moon first.

This would allow us to learn how to live and work in space, as well as establish a permanent human presence there.However, some people feel that we should instead focus our resources on going to Mars. They point out that we have already been to the moon, so there is no need to go back. Others argue that we need to establish a footprint on Mars in order to keep our options open in case technology changes or other nations develop their own capabilities.

Ultimately, Nasa is looking for feedback on its objectives. Comments can be submitted through March 13th 

How will it affect earth’s environment?

Nasa is reviewing comments on its objectives for exploring the moon, including whether to return astronauts there and establish a permanent human presence.The space agency release a draft set of exploration goals in December that include returning astronauts to the moon by 2024 and sending them further into the solar system.

But some scientists and space advocates say those objectives are too limited and should be revise to include establishing a permanent human presence on the moon or even traveling to Mars.“There’s no question that returning humans to the moon is important,” said Michael Gazarik, president of The Space Foundation. “But it’s also important for us to think about what else we could do with an outpost on the moon.”

What are some questions people have about the project?

• What are the moon’s resources that could be used for human settlement
• How do we protect Earth from potential damage if humans go to the moon
• Could we use the moon as a way station on our journey to Mars